mcp: add and implement SessionStorage interface #215
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a step toward enabling distributed MCP servers. This would allow new types of session storage like - Database backed sessions - Stateless sessions This implementation supports streamable HTTP, SSE, and custom Transports.
joshwlewis
changed the title
|
See #232. In particular, we don't want to save transports, we want to save session state. |
|
Thanks -- closing in favor of #232. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a step toward enabling distributed MCP servers. It's a new interface that would allow additional types of session stores like:
This interface supports streamable HTTP, SSE, and custom Transports.
MemorySessionStore is the only current implementation. Other implementations are left to users for now.
This doesn't totally solve distributed MCP servers - routing messages between server instances still needs to be solved.
Related: #148, #212