Skip to content

Conversation

vixalien
Copy link
Contributor

In this PR, I:

  • Updated the gi-types
  • Correctly placed them into the correct path (at src/langs/typescript/template/gi-types
  • Fixed the global workbench type not working

This is in reference to #870 (comment)

image

Copy link
Contributor

@sonnyp sonnyp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

Isn't it a good time to generate accurate types ourselves?

Add a simple script that will generate the types for us. Probably similar to https://github.com/vixalien/gi-typescript-definitions/blob/main/generate_types_in_flatpak.sh

workbenchdev/demos#201

https://floss.social/@jumplink/114218446354825670

@vixalien
Copy link
Contributor Author

We can. But I don't know if it's the best idea, the diffs will be huge.

@sonnyp
Copy link
Contributor

sonnyp commented Mar 24, 2025

Why is that an issue?

@sonnyp
Copy link
Contributor

sonnyp commented Mar 29, 2025

@vixalien ping :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants